Retrospective observational study on safety of sedation for colonoscopies in ASA I and II patients performed by a nurse and under the supervision of anesthesiology.

INTRODUCTION: Out of operating room sedation with propofol by non-anaesthesiologists (Non Anaesthesiologist Administration of Propofol: NAAP) is a growing practice. This is due to the increase in minimally invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures requiring sedation, and the difficulty of anaesthesiology services to respond adequately to this demand. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study is to assess the safety of a programme of nurse sedationist-administered target controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol in colonoscopies supervised by anaesthesiologists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Over a period of 6 months, all ASA I and II patients who required colonoscopy and met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. A total of 381 colonoscopies were performed. Episodes of desaturation, hypo- or hypertension, bradycardia or tachyarrhythmia and the need for anaesthesiology assistance during sedation were analysed. After the procedure, patient satisfaction was assessed on a scale of 1-5, and pain was assessed on a numerical verbal scale of 1-5. RESULTS: A small percentage (5%) of patients presented oxygen saturation of less than 90%, without requiring mask ventilation; 7.35% presented hypotension, 3.94% presented bradycardia, and the supervising anaesthesiologist was called in 22% of cases. Patient satisfaction at the end of the procedure was 4.27 out of 5. CONCLUSION: Sedation during colonoscopy in ASA I and II patients following an agreed protocol can be safely administered by nurse sedationists under the supervision of an anaesthesiologist.

Estudio observacional retrospectivo sobre la seguridad de la sedación para colonoscopias en pacientes ASA I y II realizada por enfermería y tutelada por anestesiología / Retrospective observational study on safety of sedation for colonoscopies in ASA I and II patients performed by a nurse and under the supervision of anesthesiology

Introducción: La sedación con propofol por no anestesiólogos es una práctica creciente en áreas fuera de quirófano resultado del incremento de procedimientos diagnóstico-terapéuticos mínimamente invasivos que precisan sedación y de la dificultad de los servicios de anestesiología para responder adecuadamente a esta demanda. Objetivo: El objetivo principal de este estudio es valorar la seguridad de un programa de sedación para colonoscopias administrada por enfermería formada y tutelada por anestesiólogos, aplicando un protocolo de sedación con sistemas Target Controlled Infusion. Material y métodos: Durante un periodo de 6 meses se incluyeron en el estudio todos los pacientes ASA I y II que precisaron la realización de una colonoscopia programada y cumplían los criterios de inclusión. Se realizaron 381 colonoscopias. En el procedimiento se analizaron los episodios de desaturación, hipo- o hipertensión, bradicardia o taquiarritmia y la necesidad de asistencia por anestesiología. Tras el procedimiento se evaluó en una escala de 1 a 5 el nivel de satisfacción y el dolor mediante escala verbal numérica de 0 a 10. Resultados: El 5% de los pacientes presentó una saturación de oxígeno menor del 90% sin requerir ventilación con máscara; el 7,35% presentó hipotensión, el 3,94% bradicardia y fue necesario consultar al anestesiólogo responsable en el 22% de los casos. El grado de satisfacción alcanzado por los pacientes al final del proceso fue de 4,27 sobre 5. Conclusión: La sedación durante colonoscopias, en pacientes ASA I y II, siguiendo un protocolo consensuado puede ser administrada de forma segura por personal de enfermería tutelado por anestesiología.(AU)

Introduction: Out of operating room sedation with propofol by non-anaesthesiologists (Non Anaesthesiologist Administration of Propofol) is a growing practice. This is due to the increase in minimally invasive diagnostic and therapeutic procedures requiring sedation, and the difficulty of anaesthesiology services to respond adequately to this demand. Objective: The main objective of this study is to assess the safety of a programme of nurse sedationist-administered target controlled infusion of propofol in colonoscopies supervised by anaesthesiologists. Material and methods: Over a period of 6 months, all ASA I and II patients who required colonoscopy and met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. A total of 381 colonoscopies were performed. Episodes of desaturation, hypo- or hypertension, bradycardia or tachyarrhythmia and the need for anaesthesiology assistance during sedation were analysed. After the procedure, patient satisfaction was assessed on a scale of 1 to 5, and pain was assessed on a numerical verbal scale of 1 to 5. Results: A small percentage (5%) of patients presented oxygen saturation of less than 90%, without requiring mask ventilation; 7.35% presented hypotension, 3.94% presented bradycardia, and the supervising anaesthesiologist was called in 22% of cases. Patient satisfaction at the end of the procedure was 4.27 out of 5. Conclusion: Sedation during colonoscopy in ASA I and II patients following an agreed protocol can be safely administered by nurse sedationists under the supervision of an anaesthesiologist.(AU)

Anestesia subaracnoidea hipobárica metamérica para las técnicas de refuerzo vertebral. Experiencia en 6 casos / Hypobaric metameric subarachnoid anaesthesia for anaesthetic management in vertebral reinforcement techniques. Our experience in 6 cases

Las técnicas de refuerzo vertebral, como la vertebroplastia y la cifoplastia percutáneas, son técnicas mínimamente invasivas empleadas en el tratamiento de las fracturas-aplastamientos vertebrales. Las técnicas anestésicas empleadas durante estos procedimientos son variadas y con diversos resultados. Presentamos una serie de 6 casos, vertebroplastias y cifoplastias, realizados con anestesia subaracnoidea hipobárica metamérica, en los que la estabilidad hemodinámica y la analgesia obtenidas fueron satisfactorias (AU)

Vertebral reinforcement techniques, such as percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, are minimally invasive procedures used in the treatment of fractured or collapsed vertebras. The anaesthetic techniques employed during these procedures are diverse and with variable results. We report 6 cases, vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty using subarachnoid metameric anaesthesia with a hypobaric technique. Haemodynamic stability and analgesia were satisfactory in all of them

[Hypobaric metameric subarachnoid anaesthesia for anaesthetic management in vertebral reinforcement techniques. Our experience in 6 cases]. / Anestesia subaracnoidea hipobárica metamérica para las técnicas de refuerzo vertebral. Experiencia en 6 casos.

Vertebral reinforcement techniques, such as percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty, are minimally invasive procedures used in the treatment of fractured or collapsed vertebras. The anaesthetic techniques employed during these procedures are diverse and with variable results. We report 6 cases, vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty using subarachnoid metameric anaesthesia with a hypobaric technique. Haemodynamic stability and analgesia were satisfactory in all of them.